Case studies

Petrofac

FRA was engaged by Petrofac and its external counsel to support the company’s plea discussions with the SFO, which had been investigating the company for several years in relation to bribery allegations contrary to the UK Bribery Act.

Petrofac had been under investigation by the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) for several years in relation to allegations of bribery in the Middle East over a six-year period, for payments contrary to the UK Bribery Act. In October 2021, the British oil services provider was ordered to pay a total of £77m (£22.8m confiscation, £47.2m fine and SFO legal costs of £7m) in relation to the corrupt awarding of contracts worth £2.6bn.

Seasoned Advice with Innovative Technical Arguments

FRA was engaged by Petrofac and its external counsel to support the company’s plea discussions with the SFO. The calculation of harm from the contracts in question relied on profit calculations, which required the identification, validation and justification of all costs that Petrofac incurred to deliver the contracts. To calculate those profits, FRA performed financial analysis and conducted numerous interviews with finance and operational staff to assess the company’s benefits and challenges from the contracts in the SFO’s scope. FRA was called to explain and justify to the SFO how losses, unforeseen expenses, and additional costs arose on the relevant contracts.

Time was of the essence for the company and FRA needed to tailor a new approach to suit Petrofac’s financial situation. While FRA has a proven method for ability-to-pay studies, our expert team designed an innovative approach more suited to Petrofac’s needs but crucially still robust enough to stand up to scrutiny from authorities.

Key contacts
Trevor Wiles
Partner
,
London
Rik Workman
Partner
,
London
Rob Mason
Partner
,
London
Gordon Macleod
Partner
,
London
Related expertise
Get in touch